From XXXXXX@accel.net Sun Aug 18 06:50:32 1996
Return-Path: XXXXXX@accel.net
Received: from server.accel.net (server.accel.net [205.206.169.2]) by phobos.illtel.denver.co.us (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA07770 for <abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us>; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 06:50:29 -0700
Received: from server.accel.net ([205.206.169.81]) by server.accel.net
          (post.office MTA v1.9.1 ID# 0-11785) with SMTP id AAA283
          for <abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us>;
          Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:52:58 -0500
X-Sender: XXXXXX@accel.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 08:41:55 -0400
To: abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us
From: XXXXXX@accel.net (XXXXXX)
Subject: http://phobos.illtel.denver.co.us/pub/
Message-ID: <19960818145257367.AAA283@server.accel.net>
Status: RO
X-Status: A

i attempted to hit the above url and was greeted
by some bizarre message to the effect of "you
miserable lamer". the page went on to make all
sorts of ridculous claims, and the author somehow
deduced from the fact i was on a windows box 
that i was not only a "lamer", but not even capable
of using "real operating systems". i'm suggesting
you at least remove this page, if not stop disallowing
users on windows boxes browsing access.

i am in the process of getting two linux boxes up, one
at home on a 28.8k link and another at work which
will sit on the company t1. i came to the above url due
to the fact that altavista gave me cause to believe tcp
wrapper information was on your machine. needless to
say your little "message" to "lamers" insults the intelligence
of any individuals that at home or work have a windows
box around that they *do* use for networking when their
unix resources are, well, elsewhere.

and by the way, i have NEVER had a gpf in 95 or NT.
EVER.

yours,
XXXXXX